Categories
- About Us
- Air Pollution
- Allihies weekends
- Appeals
- Archaeology
- Buildings
- Climate Change
- Dark Skies
- EU
- EU Commission
- Fish farming
- Fisheries
- Forestry
- Freedom Information
- Funding
- Gas
- Golf Courses
- Greenhouse Gas
- How you can help
- Landfills
- Legal actions
- Marinas
- Masts
- One off houses
- Parliament. Question
- Peat Power
- Planning Cases
- Planning Fee
- Plastic Bag Tax
- Politics
- Power Plants
- Press Release
- Protected Areas
- PVC
- Quarries
- Real Ireland Tour
- Tax incentives
- Urban renewal
- Water quality
- Wind turbines
Friends' Work
// Galway By-Pass - Supreme Court decision to end ‘cosy practice'?
FIE has welcomed the first Supreme Court referral to the European Court of Justice to determine the future of the Galway By-Pass. At issue is what is meant by "adverse impact" on the "integrity" of a protected site and particularly to define what is meant by "integrity". We hope the reference marks the end of the Irish courts' cosy practice of deciding that the correct interpretation of a relevant point of EU law before them is obvious so that it is unnecessary to refer the relevant question of interpretation to the ECJ - which is typically much more pro-environment than the Irish courts.
PRESS RELEASE
FRIENDS OF THE IRISH ENVIRONMENT
4 June 2010
Galway By-Pass - Supreme Court decision to end ‘cosy practice'?
The environmental lobby group Friends of the Irish Environment welcomed yesterday's decision of the Supreme Court to refer An Bord Pleanála's approval for the €317 million Galway city outer bypass road to the European Court of Justice.
‘This first reference of an Irish environmental case to the European Court has the potential to greatly strengthen environmental protection in Ireland'.
The purpose of the preliminary reference procedure is to allow national courts to ask the European Court of Justice for a definitive interpretation of tricky points of EU law. The ECJ is asked to give a ruling on the correct interpretation of the point of EU law at issue. The case then reverts to the national court to be decided in light of the ECJ's interpretation.
At issue is what is meant by "adverse impact" on the "integrity" of a protected site and particularly to define what is meant by "integrity".
We hope this reference marks the end of the Irish courts' cosy practice of deciding that the correct interpretation of a relevant point of EU law before them is obvious so that it is unnecessary to refer the relevant question of interpretation to the ECJ - which is typically much more pro-environment than the Irish courts.
Credit: spokesman
Verification and comment: Tony Lowes / 087 2176316 / 027 74771
http://www.friendsoftheirishenvironment.net/friendswork/index.php?do=friendswork&action=view&id=846
Reads: 80
Added: 04/06/2010
Added By: Tony Lowes
Comments: 0 | Add Comment
// Read Other Articles in EU Commission
Comments are checked before they are shown on the site.





