Categories
- About Us
- Air Pollution
- Allihies weekends
- Appeals
- Archaeology
- Buildings
- Climate Change
- Dark Skies
- EU
- EU Commission
- Fish farming
- Fisheries
- Forestry
- Freedom Information
- Funding
- Gas
- Golf Courses
- Greenhouse Gas
- How you can help
- Landfills
- Legal actions
- Marinas
- Masts
- One off houses
- Parliament. Question
- Peat Power
- Planning Cases
- Planning Fee
- Plastic Bag Tax
- Politics
- Power Plants
- Protected Areas
- PVC
- Quarries
- Real Ireland Tour
- Tax incentives
- Urban renewal
- Water quality
- Wind turbines
Friends' Work
// Inshore Shellfish Fisheries Industry Ireland Fact Sheet
Cockle Fishing Industry Ireland. Main cockle fisheries occur in Dundalk Bay , Carlingford, Waterford and Tramore - all are protected areas. Traditional activity is to harvest low levels by hand with rakes. Modern harvesting methods use hydraulic dredging for cockles, razor clams and surf clams. They have no protection as they are a non-quota species.
The Dundalk Cockle Fishery
Once its capital potential had been realised the Dundalk cockle resource attracted a rapid increase in fishing effort. As cockle prices rocketed from around €700 per tonne to reach highs of €2,700 per tonne the number of boats fitted out with continuous delivery hydraulic dredging equipment, increased from 3 in 2001 to 21 in 2004.
The appearance of these dredgers resulted in conflict between the traditional rake fisheries and the continuous delivery hydraulic dredgers. Then the Dundalk Cockle fishery crashed and the fishermen agreed to stop cockle fishing. Now the dredging boats have redirected their efforts to other cockle beds such as those in the South East of the country i.e. Waterford.
South East Cockle Fishery
The cockle beds in the South East contain smaller low quality cockles. They do not grow as fast as the Dundalk Cockles.
Preliminary estimates suggest that approximately 200 tonnes of cockles were removed from Waterford Harbour in 2005. This is equivalent to levels harvested from Dundlak - Three years of harvests of this size led to the collapse of the Dundalk Cockle fishery.
Razor Clam Fishery
A larger than could be accommodated number of vessels adapted their gear to participate in the razor clam fishery which commenced in Ireland in the later 1990s. The larger east coast beds of E. siliqua in class A waters had been fished down to point where harvesting became uneconomic. Currently, there are virtually no landings to the west coast.Small razor beds for the species Ensis arcuatus on the western seaboard have been depleted and few E. siliqua are currently harvested there.
Hydraulic Dredging and Protected Areas
A legal precedent was set in relation to dredging for Cockles in protected areas in the E.U. Waddenzee Judgement. This judgement decreed that ‘the competent authorities are to authorise activities ‘only if they have made certain it will not adversely affect the integrity of that site. That is the case where no reasonable scientific doubt remains as to the absence of such effects'.Cockle dredging was stopped due to its significant environmental damage'
The effects of Hydraulic dredging include:
- Deep penetration of substrate (5-25 cm),
- High re-suspension of material,
- Removal and destruction of infauna.
- Damage to juvenile cockles through serial discarding
The activity of the hydraulic dredges is to fluidise the seabed to the depth of the target species, in the case of razor clams this could be > 20cm. Effectively, much of the substrate and its constituents is entirely removed or relocated. Mortality of associated (soft bodied) organisms is very high and the impact is considered high in all instances
.
This is a high impact operation which disrupts the food chain/web and natural sedimentary processes.
An appropriate assessment must be undertaken to ensure that this activity will not adversely affect the integrity of the site.
Additional Information.
ECJ Ruling on the Waddenzee Cockle Fishery
An appropriate assessment implies that prior to the approval of a plan or project all aspects which can affect the site's conservation objectives must be identified using the ‘best scientific knowledge in the field'. The competent authorities are to authorise activities ‘only if they have made certain it will not adversely affect the integrity of that site. That is the case where no reasonable scientific doubt remains as to the absence of such effects'.
This ruling is important because it provides legal interpretation that is binding on all EU Member States, not just the Netherlands. As such, it can be expected to have significant implications for inshore, and potentially offshore, fisheries management where the issuing of annual licences could be made conditional upon appropriate assessments.
The prevailing view has often been that fishing licences restrict exploitation rather than permitting access. As a consequence, fishing licenses have, at least in some quarters, been considered a management tool contributing to the management of protected areas, and thus not requiring an appropriate assessment under Article 6(3) of the Directive. The Court ruling makes clear that this is not an acceptable interpretation of the Directive. This ruling is likely to have significant implications for DEFRA, the Sea Fisheries Committees and some operators.( Dirk Reyntjens Copyright IEEP 2004) http://www.walescoastalpartnership.org.uk/images_client/resource/IEEP%20ECJ%20Cockle%20ruling.pdf
Table 1 and Figure 1 from Common Cockle in the Irish Sea by the Fisheries Science Services of the Marine Institute ( http://marine.ie/NR/rdonlyres/836952AA-CBFB-4A60-99AE-180E0CD0938D/0/CockleinVIIa06.pdf )
Table 1. The Dundalk Bay cockle fishery 2001-2004 inclusive, with details of the boat
dredge fishery. (source: DCMNR) - AMENDED by FIE to show estimated income.
Year | Number of boats | Dredging season | Landings to dredgers (t) | Landings to rake (t) | Total landings (t) | Price per tonne | Total income | Average income per dredger (€) | |
2001 | 3 | August - December | 9 | 0 | 9 | 700 | 6,300 | 2,100 | |
2002 | 2 to 3 | May - December | 132 | 37 | 169 | 2000 | 338,000 | 88,000 | |
2003 | 8 to 10 | January - December | 262 | 25 | 287 | 2,500 | 717,500 | 72,778 | |
2004(until July) | 20 to 21 | January - March; June - December | 201 | 0 | 201 | 1,700 | 341,700 | 16,271 |
Site Synopsis. National Parks & Wildlife Service
Site name: River Barrow and River Nore
Site code: 002162
This site consists of the freshwater stretches of the Barrow/Nore River catchments as far upstream as the Slieve Bloom Mountains and it also includes the tidal elements and estuary as far downstream as Creadun Head in Waterford.
Water Harbour is included in this candidate SAC site for its estuary, tidal mudflats, Salicornia mudflats, Atlantic salt meadows, Mediterranean salt meadows habitats - all habitats listed on Annex I of the E.U. Habitats Directive.
The site is also selected for the following species listed on Annex II of the same directive - Sea Lamprey, Twaite Shad, Atlantic Salmon, Otter, Vertigo moulinsiana and the plant Killarney Fern.
The rare Red Data Book fish species Smelt (Osmerus eperlanus) also occurs here.
Nationally important numbers of Golden Plover, and Bar-tailed Godwit are found during the winter. Wintering flocks of migratory birds.
Capital and maintenance dredging within the lower reaches of the system pose a threat to
migrating fish species such as lamprey and shad.
http://91.186.161.197/en/ConservationSites/SpecialAreasofConservationSACs/Waterford/
Relevant Directives
Council Directive 79/923/EEC on the quality required of shellfish waters
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/consleg/1979/L/01979L0923-19911223-en.pdf
Council Directive 79/409/EEC, the Birds Directive
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/birdsdirective/index_en.htm
Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the Habitats Directive
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31992L0043:EN:HTML
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy ( http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2000/l_327/l_32720001222en00010072.pdf )
Statutory Instruments - Quota Management
Sea Fisheries Secondary Legislation
The Sea-Fisheries and Maritime Jurisdiction Act 2006 (No. 8 of 2006) was signed into law on the 4th April 2006 by the President.
The 2006 Act allows for management of the State's fishing quota by means of Fishery Management Notices under section 12. These Notices will replace the monthly SIs and can be viewed by clicking here.
The 2006 Act also allows for Regulations to be made under sections 14 and 15 and these will be published as they come into force.
Statutory Instruments affecting Cockle Fishing.
Cockle (Fisheries Management and Conservation) Regulations 2007 | 05-Jan-07 | |
Cockle (Fisheries Management and Conservation) (No 2)Regulations, 2007 | 05-Jan-07 | |
Cockle (Fisheries Management and Conservation) | 11-Jun-07 | |
Regulations, 2007 | ||
Cockle (Fisheries Management and Conservation) | 11-Jun-07 | |
Regulations, 2007 | ||
Cockle (Fisheries Management and Conservation) | 20-Jul-07 | |
(Waterford Estuary) Regulations 2007 | ||
Cockle (Fisheries Management and Conservation) | 20-Jul-07 | |
(Dundalk Bay) Regulations 2007 | ||
Cockle (Fisheries Management and Conservation) | 20-Jul-07 | |
(Tramore Bay) Regulations 2007 | ||
Cockle Fisheries Management Conservation (Dundalk Bay) Regulations 2007 | 8 October 2007 |
Source http://www.dcmnr.gov.ie/Marine/Sea+Fisheries/Seafood+Policy+and+Development/Statutory+Instruments+-+Quota+Management.htm Accessed 03 November 2007
Scallop, Whelk, Clam & Cockle fisheries distribution around the Irish coast
Map available at: http://www.bim.ie/uploads/text_content/docs/Map%20of%20scallop%20whelk%20clam%20and%20cockle%20on%20Irish%20coast.html
Other Sources of information.
Edward Fahy, Jim Carroll and Sean Murran (2005) The Dundalk cockle Cerastoderma edule fishery in 2003 - 2004. Irish Fisheries Investigations No 14: 16 pp.
WFD Fishing & Aquaculture Risk Assessment Methodology GUIDANCE ON THRESHOLDS AND METHODOLOGY TO BE APPLIED IN IRELAND'S RIVER BASIN DISTRICTS Paper by the Working Group on Characterisation and Risk Assessment - Guidance document) http://www.wfdireland.ie/Documents/Characterisation%20Report/Background%20Information/Review%20of%20Env%20Impacts/Surface%20Water%20Risk%20Ass/Fishing_Risk_Assessment_Guidance.pdf
Razor Clams on Mainly East Coast http://www.marine.ie/NR/rdonlyres/7544C305-EF73-4D15-B22E-189B285A04DF/0/RazorClamsonEastlCoasts05.pdf
CONSEQUENCES OF HYDRAULIC DREDGING FOR A RAZOR CLAM ENSIS
SILIQUA (L.) BED IN THE NORTH-WEST IRISH SEA Edward Fahy and Jim Carroll http://www.ria.ie/cgi-bin/ria/papers/100669.pdf
Read the Coastwatch Press Release and background information.
Reads: 7517
Added: 03/11/2007
Added By: Tony Lowes
Comments: 2 | Add Comment
// Read Other Articles in Fisheries
| S. Fielding on 02/09/2011 |
dundalk bay cockel fishery is due to open in the next few days surely bim should do continueus surveys on the stock as its being fished and also se what seed undersised cockels survive the fishing process as the amount of theese killed could outnumber the catch and are the feed for migrateing birds due to their softer shells Article Rating: 1 / 5 |
| stephen burke on 05/07/2009 |
bim survey early summer 08 calculated 450 tons of cockle in waterford harbour,150 tons was allocated to fishermento catch, 150 ton allowance for birds and 150 tons left for breeding stock. this fishery never took place because the department of marine did not have an appropriate assesment done for waterford harbour sac. bim survey summer 09 calculated circa 50 tons cockles waterford hbr,all died due to bad weather last summer and too much fresh water ie natural circumstances ,how many birds starved as a result of this? Article Rating: 1 / 5 |
Comments are checked before they are shown on the site.





